I’m aware that for those of you who read Greek that the title of this post is tautologous. However, compared to Andrew Sullivan who is monomaniacal on the subject of Palin, I only mention her occasionally.
The aforementioned Palin-obsessed columnist has a useful collection of Palin’s very strange lies. Read and be baffled by how she still seems to command attention, to say nothing of the hopes of the delusional right.
{ 5 comments }
Why do you believe Andrew Sullivan?
Mainly because over the many months of his obsession (which is biased against what he sees – I think on the whole rightly – the brainless and religious right takeover of the Republican party) he has provided a fair bit of evidence that these are lies. It is the evidence I believe, rather than the journalist per se)
From his long list, which do you see as the most damning “lies”? I’m not going to go through the whole list, but I’d be willing to go through two or three to see if Sullivan’s words have any connection to the truth.
(However, it’ll be the end of the week as I’m going away for a few days on cell group retreat this afternoon)
If I can find the time – all I remember is finding the evidence convincing at those times in the past when I’d read the various things he summarises here.
I’d forgotten you fancied her
It’s that proverbial ‘hot librarian’ look…
Comments on this entry are closed.